Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matty's avatar

In a web increasingly full of AI slop, I am seeking more content like yours, not less! Keep doing what you do best, and I will keep reading.

I also want to comment on this claim:

"there doesn’t seem to be any cognitive task that you can practice and make yourself better at other cognitive tasks."

While this is true for fluid intelligence (e.g., abstract reasoning, spatial ability), it is not strictly true for crystallised intelligence (e.g., general knowledge, verbal knowledge). Research shows that crystallised intelligence typically increases into one's 50s or even 60s before it begins to decline. This pattern occurs because we continually acquire new knowledge and can reliably retrieve it from memory. In theory, someone who devotes much more time to learning should develop higher abilities that fall under crystallized intelligence than someone who devotes much less time.

Expand full comment
Richard Meadows's avatar

The other relevant thing re: shoes is that you can take them on and off. Which is not really an option for evolution, at least for anything structural. So if there are downsides to having the plates equipped at all times, then you're right back to the Algernon argument.

What's the cognitive equivalent of that? Maybe stimulants? I'm pretty sure the performance improvements are zero-sum over time, but still useful in that you can choose when is the most convenient time to get a smartness boost.

PS: your blog is a pure delight. I'm finding a lot of the value of using LLMs is in thinking of interesting questions to ask (how to square supershoes with the Algernon effect?). So there is unlikely to be a world where I could get Dynomight-quality research and whimsy on demand, which is sad for me, but good news for you.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts